Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To the what extent do you agree or dis-agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impacts have spareked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that increasing the human life expectancy can be a plus and I will analyze that throught this essay.
From a general standpint, improving medical skills can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that medical teaching, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiement which are discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both medical equipment and medical systems apparently can be seen.
within the realm of a public arena, quality of life might increase the consequences of this hospital systems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with public santitation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of life experiences.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of healthy life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...dical systems apparently can be seen. within the realm of a public arena, quality of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73076923077 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22001386612 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679487179487 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1784687696 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107866934885 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382008691661 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277451708342 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576340137311 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154625239795 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.