Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree. ?
There is no denying that due to revolutionary change is medical science, the life expectancy of people is significantly increasing. Some people consider it as a big achievement while some people saying it is not a positive development. This essay will further cater you necessary arguments before jumping to conclusion.
As we compare the previous data than it suggests that, the death rate has been increased from 47.00 in1990 to 52 in 2018. Though this trend is optimistic so, now our near and dear are living more years than the previous. Apart from that this data in brief also points out that people are now taking a right decision towards their health and this attributed to improvement in public health as well. With this substantial increase in public health, the financial burden of medical care medication has been increasing on people in terms regular medical check-ups and observations. It’s good that one stays in the family for long period but financial burden also creates conflict with family.
In addition, living long times means less productive workforce for the nation which is an overall loss for the country. Going ahead, we are living in a country, where we are having a scarcity of basic resources which is indeed non-renewable. Further, it causes overpopulation which again leads to many problems like a lake of basic amenities and other problems so being an advantage, it falls under negative list.
To sum up with the above points, one can conclude that increase in life expectancy has its own favors with gloomy sides and which cannot be unnoticed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rden also creates conflict with family. In addition, living long times means les...
^^^
Line 6, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my sides and which cannot be unnoticed.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, in brief, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0608365019 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71805412792 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3657107424 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089106923781 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320885160413 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354203017226 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475942057202 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169240710984 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.