medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. to what extent do u agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of medical-medicine is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that physical health can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From an educational standpoint, medical practitioner can provide schools with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of drugs, as well as health benefits, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the long-life and living organisms. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both living legends and personal crisis apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, drugs without prescribed might increase the consequences of physical and mental health problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technological advancement could relate to this reality that the demerits of modern creation pertain to less-life expectancy. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of wrong medicine is correlated negatively with food poisoning. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of health performance.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preventive medical technology far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of medical science prove the significance of a luxurious life, but also pinpoint safe feelings implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80784313725 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32454204019 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674509803922 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8901268765 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131792431451 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426815246425 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464922853861 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769120349578 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383614057166 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.