Medical technology is responsible for the human;s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and the corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the medical development is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the health life can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the human life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the life cycle, as well as the human body, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the life experience. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both life habits and the normal life apparently can be seen.
within the realm of science, medical life might increase the consequences of the health centre. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the healthy body could relate to this reality that the demerits of the healthy lifestyle pertain to mental health. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of chronic disease is correlated negatively with the period of illnesses. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of Chinese medicine.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the medical knowledge far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a comfortable life prove the significance of the health of human, but also pinpoint the better lifestyle implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...he normal life apparently can be seen. within the realm of science, medical life migh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37121212121 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09160531375 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6213952532 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169751587649 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561619791009 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452554274906 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943404048457 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329664223612 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.