Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one form another. To what extent do you think that statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning time and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the learning environment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that long-time employment can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying time can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of compulsory education, as well as educational development, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered studying programs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both training courses and teaching methods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, combining study and employment might increase the consequences of the working condition. Moreover, fundamental aspects of low-paid jobs could relate to this reality that demerits of working experiences pertain to employer's abilities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning facilities is correlated negatively with limited knowledge.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the necessary information prove the significance of the academic performance, but also pinpoint professional life implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8625 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31159316728 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679166666667 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4415563034 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.909090909 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152782378962 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501138910416 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344373614688 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796755037743 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191587447716 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.