Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. study and employment distract one form another. To what extent do you think that statements are realistic. Support your opinion with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning time and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning facilities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the working condition can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, combining study and employment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of studying programs, as well as training courses, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered full-time employees. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both studying subjects and studying plans apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, effective learning might increase the consequences of homework assignments. Moreover, fundamental aspects of mental capabilities could relate to this reality that demerits of improving knowledge pertain to the necessary information. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning subjects is correlated negatively with professional performance. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the learning environment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employment time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of professional careers prove the significance of the working experience, but also pinpoint the time pressure implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83794466403 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31692860062 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5248970897 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167628729327 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516023187733 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437747075915 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860658279669 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468513292055 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.