In today’s world, different government and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them?
Recently, the phenomenon of the world's problem and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the local government is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the organization strategy can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the international government can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of governmental plans, as well as the government issue, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the organization structure. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the global problem and democratic government apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, different organizations might increase the consequences of organization problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the organization government could relate to this reality that demerits of the world concerns pertain to improving the organization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of organization management is correlated negatively with problematic solutions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the development of the organization.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of facing the problem far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of government challenges prove the significance of the world organization, but also pinpoint the international problem implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
Recently, the phenomenon of the worlds problem and its corresponding impact ha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85171102662 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47866979978 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5381350889 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228490817733 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736961118849 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507594437096 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124182601413 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170073519078 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.