some people claim that the public transport should be free of charge while other disagree? do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the public transport and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the transpotation cost is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the transportation infrastructure can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, free public transport can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the transportation legislation, as well as the transportation industry, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the expence of transport. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both free transport and the low price of transport apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the transpotation system might increase the consequences of transportation development. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the road transport could relate to this reality that the demerits of transportation facilities pertain to road industry. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traffic light is correlated negatively with the price of public transport. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the road safety.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of being free of charge the public transport far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the transportation equipment prove the significance of increasing the public vehical, but also pinpoint transportation facilities implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49051768684 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7104717609 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249925697484 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867268303533 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064344623676 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154656280327 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654947893213 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.