Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of expanding cities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the local government is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that transportation systems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, public transport can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of private transport, as well as transportation development, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered road facilities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both governmental plans and road transport apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, building roads might increase the consequences of road development. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the governmental policy could relate to this reality that demerits of the cost of transport pertain to the traffic light. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the road construction is correlated negatively with driving better. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the road's signs.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of networking the government far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving transport prove the significance of the road condition, but also pinpoint the international government implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72762645914 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3594889985 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645914396887 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0557569703 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168969020103 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550522017901 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273088504381 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926846297034 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229366526858 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.