When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge. Which of these points of view do you agree? Support your argument with reasons and examples from your own experience and observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of employment strategies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying different sciences can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the study time can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of learning programs, as well as learning facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered creative employment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the study benefit and the development of study apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, peaceful employment might increase the consequences of working conditions. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that demerits of managing time pertain to the employment sciences. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of permanent employees is correlated negatively with the realistic employee. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the employee salary.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of comfort learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning facilities prove the significance of the rate of employment, but also pinpoint the study plan implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68992248062 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23137747293 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4595133711 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0230882235644 0.242375264174 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00756566835012 0.0925447433944 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0145480111557 0.071462118173 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0129205899787 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145663899112 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.