Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly felling under pressure. What do you think are the cause of this? What solutions can you suggest?
Recently, the phenomenon of the students working and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the education system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that working conditions can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, limiting the time for studying can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the program of studying, as well as the academic knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the work experience. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the learning process and the limiting knowledge apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, feeling pressure during studying and working might increase the consequences of less performance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the theoretical knowledge could relate to this reality that the demerits of the lack of activities in the classroom pertain to the limited information. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of low paid salary is correlated negatively with feeling stress. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the considerable experience.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the working time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of qualified staff in near future prove the significance of practical skills, but also pinpoint academic experiences implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59191176471 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21356128041 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639705882353 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1356870816 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159983964585 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474971810098 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325780557012 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835497747169 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178746392158 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.