Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of employment's needs is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying different sciences can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the study time can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of valuable time, as well as learning programs, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered creative employment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the study issues and needing time apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, requiring peace might increase the consequences of employment roles. Moreover, fundamental aspects of study plans could relate to this reality that demerits of peaceful places pertain to time management. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning facilities is correlated negatively with the working condition. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of employment science.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the comfort of employment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the employment rate prove the significance of the learning environment, but also pinpoint the study fact implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63671875 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19317958687 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1551097138 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234617932207 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734600068732 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444395665491 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126861747858 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313099898012 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.