Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of health services is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the human lifespan can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the life cycle, as well as the normal life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a healthy lifestyle. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the life experience and the happy life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, human health might increase the consequences of medical knowledge. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of mental health could relate to this reality that demerits of the health care pertain to health benefits. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of chronic illnesses is correlated negatively with the period of diseases. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the immune function.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the medical development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of chines medicine prove the significance of health systems, but also pinpoint the general health implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46718146718 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10541863062 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640926640927 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9521231304 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112638822908 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038091501526 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376717907265 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599787753018 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183759292646 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.