Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the building design and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of modern building is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that professional life can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the people's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the work life, as well as the lifestyle, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, When I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered architectural designs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the comfortable life and the life experience apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the impact of design building on people's work might increase the consequences of building materials. Moreover, fundamental aspects of contemporary design could relate to this reality that demerits of working conditions pertain to working abilities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the poor material is correlated negatively with primitive architecture. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of ancient buildings.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments, I profoundly believe the benefits of the positive impact of designing building far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the environmental design prove the significance of the structure of the building, but also pinpoint the building decoration implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...s essay. From a social standpoint, the peoples life can provide the society with some ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6463878327 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2862271222 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0917723654 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350447720154 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104136806512 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783208780464 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180458155214 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040126636704 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.