When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Sceptical claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge. Which of these points of view do you agree with most? Support your argument with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
irrefutable, the topic of computers productivity has become a heated debate. Although many people assert that advancement in computer technology is beneficial for humanity, the others refute this proposition. This essay will discuss how computers have fortified human lives and reach a logical conclusion.
There are many arguments about why the computer has many advantages in all fields of societies in which the most preponderant one is that it is very useful in the education sector. Furthermore, it has unique applications in the health sector which not only improve life expectancy as well as it is also considered a fundamental part of communication advancements. For example, a study proved that in this modern era every technology now consists of computer-based chips. Consequently, the computer plays a pivotal role in the education and health sectors.
Another contributing factor would be that it is also a very important part of networking and designing of things. Moreover, it also helps to run simulations before running any designed equipment which saved a lot of money. For instance, a recent survey shown that with the help of advanced computer software scientists are now able to discover a lot more unpredictable technologies. Apparently, the computer is a key element when it comes to discovering new products.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the advantages of computer systems in terms of providing benefits to education, health, and science sector. Therefore, in my opinion, its potential benefits are more than its negative implications and one can ignore it at a substantial cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Irrefutable
irrefutable, the topic of computers productivity ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38735177866 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20201529285 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1746298509 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.846153846 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.25397266985 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160963956292 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588378267605 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374403302393 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938822188079 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188902187377 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.