How does the design of building affect, either positively or negatively, where people work and live?
The design of the building plays an essential role in well being of an individual as well as the society. The issue of whether the design of building affect or not has sparked a heated debate. While some argue that space is beneficial, I think that the visual aspect positively affects where people work and live. In this essay, I will put forward my point of view by analysing both sides of arguments.
To begin with, the visual aspect is much better, to cite an example, according to a recent survey done by the Stanford University, 85% of the people benefited from the visual aspect, whereas 15% of people faced disadvantages due to it. They improved their existing scenario extraordinarily and paved their way for a better economic future.
Those who assert that the space is better choice come forward with the traditional way of thinking. They suggest that space positively affects where people spend most of their time. To illustrate, they showcased the recent article in 'The Times of India' newspaper, which published that around 10% of people successfully managed. This illustration does not give full support to their argument.
To conclude, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, I suggest that the visual aspect is good.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, whereas, while, i think, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95283018868 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61681516526 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8950664597 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227856531712 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841427703287 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986538608165 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115866115374 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109125628241 0.0609392437508 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.