In today’s world, different governments and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them?
Recently, the phenomenon of governments and international organization confronting with many problems in today’s world and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that pressing problems among governments and international organization can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, governmental pressing problem in today’ world can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I preformed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within a realm of public arena, pressing different governments and international organization by confronting many problems might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the most pressing problem in today’s world for different governments and international organization far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ment which discovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09293680297 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48152328851 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5088766203 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38226167763 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131980569627 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145318450386 0.071462118173 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224757158142 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967715595464 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.34 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.