Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of the impossibility of combining study and employment and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that requiring time, comfort and peace for effective learning can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the influence of employment on effective learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within a public arena, combining study and employment and its influence on effective learning might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of distracting effective learning by employment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87295081967 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3034388563 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0383607126 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.3 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198088205095 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722694835776 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662867222102 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11254788157 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366878279968 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.