More information available online, so library books are useless. Agree or Disagree?
Surely there has been no time in the history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typically day revels online books have been one of most prominent topic in the in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain whether library books are useless. I fully agree with notion and elaborate in my further paragraph.
To begin with, there are many advanced of online books. Firstly online are carried very easily than rather books. And the first forest, online materials are more valuable than books. And online books are free of cost. Moving farther there is more portable of online books. And study can anyplace and anywhere with the help of internet. And online books are update day by day for example PDF app update daily if we gain more knowledge daily.
Problem further, if people will have any kind difficult regarding understanding, they can search from dictionaries which also available on internet. Online materials are gives the easy material for study and also gives important topic.
To conclude, online material is more useable rather than books because individual can get a wide range of information from different internet sites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in the'.
Suggestion: in the
...s have been one of most prominent topic in the in the contemporary discussion. People have al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ormation from different internet sites.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 20.9802955665 19% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 1207.87684729 85% => OK
No of words: 201.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12935323383 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50212651817 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601990049751 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5722891462 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.6428571429 104.977214359 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3571428571 20.9669160288 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162711851418 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555376362468 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479046600499 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945153240329 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450917326332 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.