"More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with the statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of online information and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of reading books is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that library books can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, reading online books can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that book publishers, as well as printing books, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of online materials. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and using libraries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, reading library books might increase the consequences of online sources. Moreover unique aspects of writing books relate to this reality that the demerits of reading novels pertain to online novels. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of useless books is correlated negatively with useful books. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of online papers.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using online books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online libraries prove the significance of purchasing books, but also pinpoint bestseller books implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ase the consequences of online sources. Moreover unique aspects of writing books relate ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly do the advantages of online libraries prove the significance of purchasing boo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55952380952 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0697439086 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6443901348 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205282626698 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748824852938 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321614365551 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126106580933 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263432092429 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.