More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of information available online and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the electronic book is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that e-book market can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, online books can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of educational achievement, as well as the research facility, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered teaching methods and learning environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the student's motivation and the vast subjects apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, e-book software might increase the consequences of library books. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the faulty testing system could relate to this reality that the demerits of online reading pertain to hearing loss in the ear. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of e-book usage is correlated negatively with the overall score. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational facilities.

To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of e-library far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of electronic publications prove the significance of fastest learning environment, but also pinpoint advanced tuition implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s, beneficial ramifications of both the students motivation and the vast subjects appare...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the fastest'.
Suggestion: of the fastest
...nic publications prove the significance of fastest learning environment, but also pinpoint...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69465648855 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23606505026 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667938931298 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3598705134 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147494653935 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467428710014 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488286033716 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781349904803 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439683491824 0.0609392437508 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.