In the era of information and technologically advanced world, it is irrefutable and undeniable that library books are losing its importance due to the plethora of information available online. Some people opine that library books cannot be replaced, while others maintain that online information can simply outweigh the advantages provided by library books. This essay will discuss why library books are useless and how its significance dwindled.
Firstly, the introduction of E-books was revolutionary in the field of education. Almost all the authors publish their books online, and people can pay for the books to read it. In a study conducted by Stanford University, the number of people who visit the library has significantly reduced and people use their computer to search for information online. Moreover, people can easily carry E-books in their handheld devices, and people need not carry huge books when they travel.
Secondly, the amount of time people spend to search for information has greatly reduced as a simple search would retrieve all the necessary information. This would drastically save the precious time of the readers and they can get all these information from their place. For instance, when a research student wants to check if there had been research earlier on the same topic, they can easily get this information online. They need not search all the related books in the library which consumes a lot of time.
This essay discussed why library books are losing its importance as the internet provides myriad details online. In conclusion, in the current era, library books are slowly becoming useless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ime of the readers and they can get all these information from their place. For instance, when a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28735632184 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72900772351 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5220645147 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192310343724 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852706634262 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484204280293 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136404564969 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615802552321 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.