Most alcoholics purchase liquor legally. According to your point of view, should stores in general be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics?
There is constant debate whether the liquor store should be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics or liquor store should be prohibited to sell liquor to the alcoholic. This essay will discuss the different aspect of this statement.
Firstly, alcohol store are there to conduct business and earn money and if any alcoholic person who is legally allowed to buy the alcohol then store should sell the liquor to him/her. Secondly, sometimes when the stores denies alcoholic people of the liquor, they resort to the violence. For example, in the Australian city of Darwin there are many cases when an alcoholic person became violent and put himself/herself and the seller in the danger when the seller did not sell him/her alcohol. Therefore, to be safe and conduct business in peaceful manner liquor store should be allowed to sell the liquor legally.
Having said that, selling liquor to an alcoholic person raises a question of ethics on the part of the seller. Selling liquor to the an alcoholic person is unethical because alcoholic person are mentally unstable, unemployed and the money they use are usually stolen from their own house or the neighours. For instance, there are many cases in rural part of Nepal where an alcoholic person steals from their own home to buy liquor and due to which to family member suffers. In addition, the sellers usually knows the source of the money of an alcoholic person and even after knowing that if the sellers sells the liquor then it is unethical.
This esay analysed the two aspects of selling liquor to an alcoholic. I agree that the liquor store should not sell alcohol to an alcoholic person but only to some extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...e part of the seller. Selling liquor to the an alcoholic person is unethical because a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87368421053 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40307589904 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463157894737 0.580463131201 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1840368486 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471887918977 0.242375264174 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223981366669 0.0925447433944 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151442455242 0.071462118173 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356398992411 0.151781067708 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978158940764 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.