As national services, which one deserve to receive more financial support, education or health?
Recently, the phenomenon of prioritizing between education and health budgets and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many people that the matter of investment in health problems is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that allocating money for education can be a plus, and I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, spending money for health organizations from national services can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this reality that the merits of preventing a pandemic, as well as treating deathful infections, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered an allocated budget for vaccination in remote areas and the dramatic decline of diseases. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both short-term plans and critical situations apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, financial support in the education field might increase the consequences of aware generation. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of technological devices could relate to the fact that the demerits of lack of equipment about unprofessional postgraduates. As a tangible example, some research undertaken by UCLA university has asserted that more than 65% of clinical inventions are created by university students. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of increasing the level of sophisticated learners.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of allocating budget for teaching people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning skills in all fields prove the significance of doctors or experts, but also pinpoint health inventions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64864864865 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2307755855 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662162162162 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6888060474 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147679999225 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418917145543 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472682061418 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708105034916 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025708272936 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.