Nowadays, more and more people believed that overburden can help complete higher quality in achievements. For example, professional teachers, coaches believe that this applies to students and athletes, on the individual and national level. What is your point of view? Give examples to support it.
Recently, the phenomenon of hard working people can achieve better results and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of overburden problems is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of professional teachers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, working overtime can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of coaching strategies and national policies are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered individual issues. Thus, beneficial ramifications of university students apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, focusing on the goal might increase the consequences of high quality achievements. Moreover, fundamental aspects of skilled tutors could relate to this reality that the demerits of undergraduate students pertain to athletic competitions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the dowsides of national regulations are negatively correlated with its applications. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of international developments.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of high achieving people far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of competent sportsmen prove its significane, but also pinpoint local education implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84523809524 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34443305006 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686507936508 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3693881549 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185481284653 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546518632581 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452166249014 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940202604073 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330965635512 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.51 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.