one of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing, is this a curse or blessing?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the development of better medical technologies. However, there is a widespread worry that augmented rise of medical technology will be a curse as it is directly proportional to a increase in life expectancy. This essay will discuss why in my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and needs serious consideration as life expectancy increase due to better medical technology is a curse to mankind.
There is a myriad of argument in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that increase in life expectancy brings additional burden to the existing population. Needless to say, that population increase not only causes a wide range of problems just to human population, but it also causes trouble to the non-human animal population. For example, a 20% increase in life expectancy rate in China has caused a 40% reduction in per capita income to its existing population. Thus, increase in the population due to enhanced life expectancy is a major drawback.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that, modern medical technology responsible for life expectancy has also caused extended damage to the natural environment. Unlike in past, evolving medical technology is increasingly consuming components that are not nature friendly to the environment. For instance, hospitals using components made of plastic has increased tremendously which is harmful to the environment. Hence, it is apparent there is a huge damage to the environment caused by medical technology to improve life expectancy.
This essay has discussed how an increase in Life expectancy due to better medical technology is a curse as it causing a increase in population and damage to environment. In my opinion, though life expectancy is indeed increasing life expectancy it is definitely a curse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...curse as it is directly proportional to a increase in life expectancy. This essay...
^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...mage to the natural environment. Unlike in past, evolving medical technology is increas...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...ronment. Hence, it is apparent there is a huge damage to the environment caused by medical te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cal technology is a curse as it causing a increase in population and damage to en...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32542372881 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20491220215 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467796610169 0.580463131201 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9954645669 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235910526871 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982833928378 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656669714262 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169185471962 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526247108077 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.