The only way to reduce air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles. What is your opinion and explain with your own experiences and examples.
Recently the phenomenon of reducing air pollution and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of increasing prices of fuels are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that hybrid vehicles can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, decreasing air pollution can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of efficient vehicles, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of standard fuels. Hence, beneficial ramifications of sustainable ways are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, air pollution can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of diesel cars are visible. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described increased prices. Thus, predicted outcomes of unsustainable vehicles are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of reducing air pollution far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing the price of fuels prove the significance of sophisticated vehicles, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7149321267 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25155235215 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660633484163 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5600593532 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23971594283 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717355877606 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484952783343 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129608985828 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412136925758 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.