Recently It has been seen that some organizations would integrate employees in decision making process of the company's good and services. This has multiple advantages and disadvantages, whereas some people says that, It has more disadvantages over advantages, I sanguinely believe that it will have more advantages. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, conspicuously, there are myriads of reasons to support this notions but one of the most compelling reasons is that when company involve employees in the decision making process it build a trust relationship among employees and company management, this will bring harmony among employees. Another cogent reasons is that when company had employees have mutual understanding it will positively impact the employee's work efficiency. For Example: RCL company conducted a study where the BLUE company used to involve the employees in the goods and services decision making, this practices showed the huge growth the production and employees satisfaction.
On the contrary, There are few sceptics who conjecture that involving employees in the decision making process could be disastrous and would create dissatisfaction. for example, if employes decision is not considered, It may create a negative environment and employees would think that no one hear them in the organization, this will in turn impact the company production and may harm the reputation.
At the end, after analysing above facts, I would like to recapitulate that though there can be some challenges in implementing this but if the process is used wisely it will give the positive results and would be more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...there are myriads of reasons to support this notions but one of the most compelling ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'builds'?
Suggestion: builds
...oyees in the decision making process it build a trust relationship among employees an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...trous and would create dissatisfaction. for example, if employes decision is not co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, whereas, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46441947566 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04339324138 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.01244899 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.111111111 104.977214359 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271506533293 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121157698904 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826347703599 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153055251813 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738700098091 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.