Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of parents is responsible for their offspring’s behavior and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of supervision on children’s acts is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am profoundly inclined to believe that other social factors in every society could be impressive as well. This essay will examine both sides by providing some academic evidences before concluding.
On the one hand, from the social standpoint, there are many factors which are related in terms of youngster’s social behavior. Firstly, education can provide the society with many noticeable impacts which are rooted in the fact that some parts of children’s attitudes are forming somewhere else. Secondly, whereas parents may do their best to provide their children with sufficient resources and conditions, at the end, it is children’s decision to commit a crime. According to my own experience, when I was a student in Tehran University and participating in an educational survey, many computer games with violence scenes could be much more detrimental in young generation’s personality.
On the other hand, opponents claim that supervising could play an influential role in children’s pedagogy. As a result, parents should be accountable for some parts of their kid’s behavior while their controls are needed the most. Furthermore, parents should be role model for their children in terms of many social and educational aspects. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted by Sydney University revealed that some juvenile delinquency is negatively correlated with lacking of appropriate parenting and dysfunctional families.
To recapitulate I pen down saying that while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I highly believe that parent’s role is not the only factor to blame.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71571906355 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38213916584 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6209382663 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162237068314 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624236606925 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592895312741 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097967414865 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407005735017 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.