Recently, the phenomenon of the parent's responsibility for their children behaviour and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of responsible parents who show favouritism toward their children is highly beneficial, such this issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that educated and responsible parents can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social and educational standpoint, poor upbringing can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that juvenile delinquencies as well as illiteracy, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I perform an academic examination which discovered adolescents who have poor families usually drop out of schools and joined criminal gangs. Thus, the beneficial consequences of both literacy and family apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of nurturing, media might exacerbate the consequences of responsible parents' upbringing. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of violent games related to this reality that the demerit of poor upbringing pertains to media usage. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of growing up the children is correlated negatively with media. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of parents responsibility for media usage.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the parent's influence on children is highly obvious. Not only the advantages of responsible parents prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint other factors implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
Recently, the phenomenon of the parents responsibility for their children behav...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... media. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive the notion of parents responsibility fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68592057762 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22871666368 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8140529708 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204027913645 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077874843591 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747662658564 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119159053937 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799487523874 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.