parents should be held legally responsible for their child's acts
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts, thanks to the ubiquity of state of the art technology, modernization and globalization, There is a widespread worry that this would lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that in order to get relaxation, parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts play a crucial role in human life. Not only has the modern fast era brought a lot of opportunities all across the globe, but it has also provided various facilities to make our lives comfortable and convenient. Needless to say, all these merits stand people in all good stead, when it comes to broadening their horizons.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that in order to deal with this soaring problem government should take effective steps, which are not remote or complicated but accessible and practicable. Besides, awareness programmes should be organized to make people aware about this issue. Last but not least, local councils and state authorities should take the necessary initiatives cumulatively. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of parents should be held legally responsible for their child’s acts.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the potential benefits of parents should be held legally responsible for their child’s acts are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...'s acts, thanks to the ubiquity of state of the art technology, modernization and globaliza...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22605363985 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09277764434 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.682726114 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483161636721 0.242375264174 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182705746329 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192362411503 0.071462118173 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328191174741 0.151781067708 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849105933241 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.