Recently, the phenomenon of parental responsibility and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of children's behavior is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive. I am inclined to believe responsible parents can be a plus, and I will elaborate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, children's acts can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of unacceptable behaviors, as well as being liable for a child, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered parental influence. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social behaviors and parental skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a legal parent might increase the consequences of parent's responsibility. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of observing parents could relate to this reality that the demerits of behaviors of offsprings pertain to disciplined children. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a highly prestigious university has asserted that the downside of favorable behavior is correlated negatively with children's development. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a legal responsibility.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe the benefits of being accountable far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of inescapable responsibility prove the significance of legal parenthood but also pinpoint the parent-child relationship implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.868 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44174141969 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8651107726 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229638468948 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760489435798 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354206199727 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127067349655 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181246532166 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.