Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of climate studies is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that climate change issues can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a regional standpoint, climatical regulations can provide the region with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of global warming, as well as climate change are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of local climate on the weather. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both studying regional climate and climatology apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, climatological researchers might increase the consequences of climatical problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of having different climates could relate to this reality that the demerits of rising sea levels pertain to climate change problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the extreme weather is correlated negatively with harsh climatical conditions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of climatological sciences.
To conclude, while there are several compelling evidence on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having a diverse climate far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of different fields of climatical studies prove the significance of climatological advancements, but also pinpoint climatical facts implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74531835206 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28839377884 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4757283634 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157726398499 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580469408879 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340123412657 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981877988077 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243238513714 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.