Governments promise continuous economic growth but it is actually an illusion Some people think that governments should abandon this Please talk about the validity and implications

Rcecently, the phenomenon of governmental improvements and its corresponding imapcts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of economy is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that people's actions can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a economical standpoint, government can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the economic growth, as well as people's investments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the impacts of governments on having a thriving economy. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both economical issues and governemental advances apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of society, a continuous economic growth migh increase the consequences of goverment's responsibilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of prospering economy could relate to this reality that the demerits of people's thought pertain to governmental isses. As a tabgible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a bad economy is correlated negatively with governmental requirements. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of people's collaboration on growing economy.

To conclude, while there are several compelling evidence on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of economical improvements far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of governmental studies prove the significance of people's insight towards economy, but also pinpoint possible implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ze that throughout this essay. From a economical standpoint, government can p...
^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... Thus, beneficial ramifications of both economical issues and governemental advances appar...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83969465649 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46127443601 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9601887922 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183146755478 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056159150938 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04706771922 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951069345488 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532488343341 0.0609392437508 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.