Parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done. What is your opinion? Support it with examples.
The importance of parent in their children's acts, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The importance of children's act has sparked the controversy in recent years. It can be agreed that parents should be responsible for the activities of their kids. There are lots of activities done by kids in daily life some of these are good and some are bad. This essay will elaborate legal responsibility of parents regarding their kids, this will lead to a logical solution.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why parents should be legally responsible for their kid's activities, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that parents are the first teacher of their kids and kids learn most of the things from their parents, moreover; if parents don't provide the right environment to their children's, automatically that impact on their kids. For instance, if the husband and wife have the dispute in their house or they fight regularly, it put directly impact on kid who is living in the house.
Nevertheless, some people have an opposing view and they tend to believe that parents should not be responsible for their kid's activities. They believe that many kids learn good or bad activities from their society, friends or from social media or television. In these days social media really affect our children's lives, they learn many good or bad things from social media. So it is not right to put blame on parents for their kids activities which they learn from the internet.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of children's act is prominent, although it has a number of drawbacks that should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rom their parents, moreover; if parents dont provide the right environment to their ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, regarding, so, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91228070175 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61318954887 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.5674629911 50.4703680194 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303197823184 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120290051578 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845009802235 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192895876212 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401526312223 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.