People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, the phenomenon of diminishing face to face communications due to the Internet uses and its corresponding impacts of it has sparked a heated debate among the public. Although utilizing modern technology for doing everyday's activity is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be a plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why declining an array of meetings in daily routins are advantageous. These are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the merits of this issue. Firsty, the preleminary and mainly effect is reducing the amount of traffic. Loads of activity do not need to go out including some banking, shopping tasks, booking libraries, doctors' appoinments, hotels, restaurants and many other tasks like these. Furthermore, due to doing these tasks at homes or offices, a great deal amount of time and money is saved annually.
On the one hand, there is no doubt the idea of doing the possible activities online and diminishing our outdoor's tasks has some opponents. These inhabitants argue that people need to each other and in order to enhance the communication skills particularly in the youths, we need to more and more face to face meetings. the other factor is declining the laziness in society.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of decreasing our outdoor's activities by using modern technology are far more outweigh their demerits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...to more and more face to face meetings. the other factor is declining the laziness ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25714285714 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03264550772 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6688362464 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152919179468 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428340656905 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419859048243 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771547439043 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482080379085 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.