People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of building an advanced transportation system and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that overcrowding the cities by vehicle can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, designing new roads for vehicles can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, emphasizing government by people might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research has asserted that the creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe applying the advanced transportation system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thorny issues potential implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81779661017 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30124450953 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703389830508 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9308041819 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.818181818 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198597631907 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590698652401 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592057619666 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981343785942 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362122120004 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.