People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of building an advanced transport system instead of new roads and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it will be highly beneficial for people, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of new improved transport can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, investing money in building effective transport system like electric cars and trucks can provide the cities with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of huge saving in fossil fuels ,is inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of advance transport system in social and professional life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both using solar energy for transport and improving the frequency of public transport apparently can be seen.
From a realm of transport department, constructing more roads might reduce the consequences of traffic jams and road accidents. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new roads could relate to this reality that the merits of nation’s infrastructure pertain to more jobs for local people. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the upside of new streets and highways is correlated positively with safety of the citizens. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the advance transport system and new roads far outweigh its drawback. However, government should be prudent enough to have fruitful outcomes of this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at merits of huge saving in fossil fuels ,is inextricably bound up. According to m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52397260274 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11031876961 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7414186588 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239422292914 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839106562056 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649663349629 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144596461305 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266753693236 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.