Our global diaspora is broadly segregated into two halves oriental and occidental. So there are bound to be difference on social, economical, cultural and recreational front as well. Therefore, the issue of people pursuing dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, white water river and rafting is of no exception and irrefutable.
Ultimately, I opine that there are advantages and disadvantages associated with dangerous games, I will explain why with pertinent argument and examples. Firstly, people partake in dangerous games because of the fun associated with the games. In addition, many people take part in skydiving because it brings them joy and tranquility.
Although, research has shown that many of this games have great consequence and can lead to disabilities or even dead in individual. The effect on individual can lead to not be able to function in the society. Not only this, another pivotal aspect of my stance is that people disable can end up losing their jobs, friends, and close family bond.
To conclude, I would like to say everything has it own pros and cons. But we must be vigilant to enough to eliminated the cons. And if federal and state government can implement a safety law that can guild dangerous spot. And help keep people safe , then the risk will be reduced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...though, research has shown that many of this games have great consequence and can le...
^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
..., I would like to say everything has it own pros and cons. But we must be vigilant ...
^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...angerous spot. And help keep people safe , then the risk will be reduced.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12093023256 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83695831411 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679069767442 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4264183512 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6923076923 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189369433723 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570303036618 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110573004793 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104386271178 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923798740992 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.