A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone's benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others say that turning books into movies not only cheapens the original, but is rarely done successfully.
In your opinion, do works of literature translate effectively to the screen? Support your arguments with reasons and/ or examples from your own experience and observations.
The true projection of classical works of literature in movies as compared to books has always been the point of discussion. Some people think that literature work cannot be successfully presented in a movie, while others maintain that work of literature can be easily produced and picturized. This essay will discuss that why whether the art work can be effectively produced on screens.
Firstly, to translate and relay literature work on screen requires extreme experience. Therefore, owing to the sophistication of the work professionals exercise extreme care. Moreover, people involved in such activity do not possess any kind of real life experience of classics, hence they need to have strong imaginative and creative skills in order to attract a large number of audience. Resultantly, this delicate and highly skilled work can be projected on screen by artists utilizing their professional acumen.
On the other hand, art media workers are required to create a complete picture and plot line unlike as specified in the books. Filming of books has proved to be quite easy as the writer of the book uses his complete innate skills to transfer the real picture to the reader. Afterwards, entertainment world can utilize the writer’s skill and transform it to project on the screen. As an example, filming of books like Harry potter has proved to be easier than projecting historical scenes from movies like Troy. As a result, it is quite evident that projection of books onto cinema screens is easier than displaying complex art and literature works.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed with extreme care art and literature work can be easily projected onto the screens of cinema.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...and creative skills in order to attract a large number of audience. Resultantly, this delicate an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20363636364 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83842815307 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3232331838 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180149402054 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716344423485 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510055478189 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120729394625 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596923535039 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.