Adapting literary works into movies and television series have become increasingly more common. While some people believe that this is beneficial to everyone, others think that such practice is hardly done successfully and should not be entertained. In this essay, I will discuss why such adaptations, despite some shortcomings, benefit people and society.
Translating literary works into television programs or movies brings such works into the limelight. There may be many outstanding literary works from the past that the current generation doesn't know about. A movie or a television program is an effective means to get the messages out of those works across to people. For example, I recently watched a movie name 'Bone Collector' which is based on a novel written in the 1950s and learned many things from that period, which otherwise, I would never have been able to experience. Stated briefly, such adaptations of literature into screens are highly beneficial to people.
On the other hand, some people doubt that such adoption is done in a correct way, so the originality of the work is not preserved. While this statement has some truth, it is not sufficient to argue that the adoption doesn't benefit society. How successfully a literary work translates into a screenplay depends on a lot of factors including quality of the script, acting skills and particularly the direction capability of a director. For example, the movie that won the best movie award recently at Oscars was actually based on a novel and it was so beautifully translated from the book into the movie that it became a huge success.
In conclusion, I discussed why the adoption of literary works into television programs and movies is useful to people. In my opinion, except for a few exceptions, most of those adoptions do capture the essence of the original work, and such adoptions should be promoted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...om the past that the current generation doesnt know about. A movie or a television pro...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a correct way" with adverb for "correct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...people doubt that such adoption is done in a correct way, so the originality of the work is not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t sufficient to argue that the adoption doesnt benefit society. How successfully a lit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, briefly, if, may, so, while, except for, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1064516129 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82133428704 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529032258065 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1929424092 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.071428571 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188877557472 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737955290056 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250218568897 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125482917948 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322959463996 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.