Recently the phenomenon of waste management and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contended by many complex ways of waste segregation and its disposal is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that recycling waste is important and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, disposing of waste by recycling might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of recycling waste far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique process prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7577092511 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18810058321 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696035242291 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3249794526 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137729458428 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507800703032 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523967380597 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807615215116 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396003318682 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.