Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion?
Recently the phenomenon of taking part in voting processes and its corresponding impact have sparked a heated debate. Although contended by many that the matter of political participation is highly beneficial, such issues is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that public voting can be a plus and I will analyzed that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that both crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, mandatory voting might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some democratic research undertaken by Nobel university asserted that downside of this creative process is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of casting votes far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique process prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'analyze'
Suggestion: analyze
... public voting can be a plus and I will analyzed that throughout this essay. From a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70305676856 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13293747003 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689956331878 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.13463862 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167581771292 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556300242915 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450768645964 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938134927179 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440730982361 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.