Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion?
Recently the phenomenon of taking part in voting processes and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of political participation is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the public voting process can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, democratic claims can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of public contribution, as well as social public advantages of voting, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed academic research which discovered the subsequence right for complaining of social situation. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both voting right and social duty apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, compulsory voting might increase the consequence of public regulation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of low-social behavior would relate to this reality that the demerits of chaos in communities pertain to illegal manners of people. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a good public, is correlated negatively with the harmful complaint. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social disorder.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of taking part in voting far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of good politics prove the significance of good community, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57677902622 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18979773307 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632958801498 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2621990923 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18621050153 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574680127666 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372545552981 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995266521732 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366284604123 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.