Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion?
Recently the phenomenon of taking part in voting processes and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of political participation is highly beneficail, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I amn in clined to believe that public voting process can be aplus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpiont, democratic claims can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of public controbution, as well as social public advantages of voting, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academc research wich discovered the subsequnce right for complaintion of social situation. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both voting right and social duty apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, compelsury voting migh increase the consequence of public irregulation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of low-social behavior would relate to this reality that the demerits of chaos in communities pertain to elligal manners of people. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of good public, is correlated negatively with harmful complain. Hence, it is correct to presume the proconceived notion of social disorder.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of taking part in voting far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of good politics prove the significance of well communit, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56981132075 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1836714053 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9983796005 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18587390233 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575461338467 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037207923743 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100053823719 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382859761931 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.