Can political stability hurt economic growth?
Recently, the phenomenon of political stability and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of peaceful politic is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that regulated policy can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, internal political sustainability can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of permanent political manner, as well as financial policy, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered outstanding advantages about economic improvement. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both economic development and low-cost lifestyle apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, economic bankrupt might increase the consequence of unstable political behavior. Moreover, fundamental aspects of decreasing rates would relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of financial indications pertain to expensive trading. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of inappropriate politics are correlated negatively with inflation increasingly rate. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of high expense life.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sustainable governmental politics in finical affaire far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of low-cost goods provide prove the significance of booming economic process, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92775665399 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28630191072 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680608365019 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2340062436 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234751991925 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723420517557 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499910562202 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124372426548 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435155876842 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.