What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why?
Recently, the phenomenon of the best invention of the century and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the computer invention is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that creative ideas can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, invention of antibiotics is able to provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of curing the infections, as well as medical developers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered various invention of century has made life easier. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both antibiotics usage rate and modern medical development apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the hazards of airplane invention might increase the consequence of fossil fuel consumption. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technology would relate to this reality that the demerits of useless inventions pertain to complicated products of invention. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of simple ideas is correlated negatively with uncomfortable devices. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of undeveloped fields.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of creation of devices far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of easy and healthy life style prove the significance of high level sanitation, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | sarh | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | Ammu helen | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 77
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credits. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their family. Discuss. 88
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'antibiotics'' or 'antibiotic's'?
Suggestion: antibiotics'; antibiotic's
...s, the beneficial ramifications of both antibiotics usage rate and modern medical developme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61172161172 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22846761271 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659340659341 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.191541068 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0724823836812 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239462959801 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286124893002 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038878490751 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025894544924 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.