Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the environmental impressions of the building design and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the convinced design methods is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that comprehended plan programs can be a plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a psychology standpoint, a valuable architecture design can provide the working or living areas with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of careful identification of space, as well as the attention to the people’s behaviour and needs, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the marvellous positive interaction between people and the surrounding work area. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both interesting spaces and well-designed communal places apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, mounting unfavourable influences of building design might increase the consequence of disorder behaviours. Moreover, fundamental aspects of incompatible roles would relate to this reality that the demerits of the traditional design pertain to cramped living and working areas. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of becoming boredom is correlated negatively with the inappropriate design process of buildings. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the negative results of the building.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of good design and predict of the thoughtful responses in the building far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of inspired working and living areas prove the significance of the preciousness of life and job, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1207.87684729 148% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64556962025 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30225120224 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 379.143842365 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.7784121259 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.181818182 104.977214359 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 20.9669160288 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302797924884 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870976476141 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414490475723 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145008678522 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244513265037 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.