Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.r?
Recently, the phenomenon of children learning promotion and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of modern methods of educations like musical learning is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that artistic training can be plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, new promoted musical methods of learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of improved quality of children life, as well as practical education method, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered marvellous results of the creative process of practising method over the promoted learning strategies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both sensitive leading ways and mass media role in teaching apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, mounting the unfavourable effects of traditional education for children might increase the consequence of ineffective learning. Moreover, fundamental aspects of undesirable results of mentioned methods would relate to this reality that the demerits of difficult learning subjects pertain to getting bored during studying. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of child life schooling pleasure is correlated negatively with low-quality education. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of critical methods of learning.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using the music-based method of upbringing far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of talent extension prove the significance of considerable learning, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77740863787 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16664105785 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664451827243 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9256396536 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.090909091 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172968571069 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556297981768 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447959942068 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924517899394 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300362750389 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.43 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 55.0591133005 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.