Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their family. Discuss | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their family. Discuss

Recently,
the phenomenon of long time working and its corresponding impacts have sparked
a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of affordable work
is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive
and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe
that optimum work hours can be plus and I will analyze that throughout this
essay.From a
social standpoint, hardworking can provide the society with some noticeable
effect which rooted in the fact that the merits of full time jobs, as well as high-paid
job, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a
university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered analytical
results of spending too much hours at work. Thus, beneficial ramifications of
both part time jobs and family time apparently can be seen.<o:p></o:p>

Within the
realm of science, working rush hours might increase the consequence of fatigue
and energy lost. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional work timetable
would relate to this reality that the demerits of unaffordable cooperation pertain
to long hours working. As an example some scientific research undertaken by a
prestigious university has asserted that the downside of non-stop working is
correlated negatively with job efficacy. Hence, it is correct to presume the
preconceived notion of family leisure time.To conclude,
while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that
the benefits of optimization of working hours far weigh its drawbacks. Not only
do the advantages of vibrant workplace prove the significance of family
relationships. But also pin point the long-term implications.<o:p></o:p>

Votes

Essay Categories

PTE_Academic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 52, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...h rooted in the fact that the merits of full time jobs, as well as high-paid job, are in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 25, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...red analytical results of spending too much hours at work. Thus, beneficial ramific...
^^^^
Line 16, column 6, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...Thus, beneficial ramifications of both part time jobs and family time apparently can be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 24, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eration pertain to long hours working. As an example some scientific research und...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1207.87684729 188% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 8.27272727273 5.00649968141 165% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 12.4021347136 2.71678728327 457% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658181818182 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 379.143842365 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.3 1.57093596059 146% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 142.683706148 50.4703680194 283% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 227.5 104.977214359 217% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 29.0 4.12807881773 703% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127491854601 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581291731668 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045702395316 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0419017590279 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551065465946 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.3 12.6369458128 248% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -15.15 53.1260098522 -29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.1 10.9458128079 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 30.98 11.5310837438 269% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 31.0 10.5123152709 295% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.